asks at hand - I figured I would blog about what I've been up to recently. This will give some insight into the challenges that existing coding professionals are facing today.Before I let you in on what's been on my plate, I should mention that there is no crossover between these two topics. They are two very different aspects of coding that use two entirely different parts of the human brain. Or at least, they use two very different parts of my brain! When asked why I am so deeply involved in two areas that are so vastly different, all I can say is, I love a challenge. And challenged I've been!
CPT Code Changes
I know what you're thinking. "It's March, Kristi, the CPT code changes were effective January 1 so that's old news." Well, the reality is, it takes some time to get used to new codes. Since I spend a significant amount of time as a subject matter expert (SME) for my clients in the realm of cardiac catheterization and peripheral vascular interventional radiology coding and charging, I can tell you that 2011 has presented my clients with some significant challenges. First of all - the deletion and nearly complete overhaul of the cardiac catheterization section of CPT. If you have a chance to look at a 2011 CPT codebook (I recommend the Professional Edition since it shows all code changes in color-coded fashion), and compare it to a 2010 book, you'll see what I mean.
My biggest challenge? They changed the code descriptions and code numbers, but in many cases used the same digits - just in a different order. A dyslexic's nightmare and yes, yours truly is dyslexic. There are a couple of perks now - we no longer have to worry about coding left ventriculography separately, it's bundled into the left heart catheterization code, and for the most part, supervision and interpretation (S&I) codes are a thing of the past.
The peripheral vascular coding is getting really interesting. This year the American Medical 
Association (AMA) decided that leg revascularization procedures could be more effectively reported using bundled codes. This new Wal-Mart approach to coding is becoming more commonplace in interventional radiology (IR) coding. What do I mean about Wal-Mart codes? Well, vascular IR coding has historically involved the separate reporting of all procedure codes, including the catheterization or approach, which is typically a no-no in coding. The end result is often a list of 4 or 5 codes to describe one procedure. Wal-Mart coding is "one stop shopping" where everything is included in a single code. Maybe I should call them Ragu codes for those who remember the old Ragu pasta sauce commercials. You know - "It's in there!" This Wal-Mart or Ragu concept of coding means unlearning many complex IR coding guidelines that have been ingrained in our brains over the past few years.
Association (AMA) decided that leg revascularization procedures could be more effectively reported using bundled codes. This new Wal-Mart approach to coding is becoming more commonplace in interventional radiology (IR) coding. What do I mean about Wal-Mart codes? Well, vascular IR coding has historically involved the separate reporting of all procedure codes, including the catheterization or approach, which is typically a no-no in coding. The end result is often a list of 4 or 5 codes to describe one procedure. Wal-Mart coding is "one stop shopping" where everything is included in a single code. Maybe I should call them Ragu codes for those who remember the old Ragu pasta sauce commercials. You know - "It's in there!" This Wal-Mart or Ragu concept of coding means unlearning many complex IR coding guidelines that have been ingrained in our brains over the past few years. The new leg revascularization codes are set up based on a heirarchy - angioplasty followed by atherectomy followed by stenting - with newly established vascular territories. The iliac territory consists of three vessels. The femoral-popliteal territory is treated as a single vessel. And the tibioperoneal territory as three vessels. To make things more confusing, the AMA deleted all of the atherectomy codes from Category I in CPT and moved them to Category III.
And because IR is arguably the most difficult area of CPT coding (as an IR SME I may be biased), someone has to research all this and educate coders on the changes. Thus, I find myself updating training materials with these changes and presenting the changes. If the areas of cardiac catheterization and IR interest you, I suggest you acquire a solid foundation on basic medical coding first. These 2 areas are difficult for even the most seasoned coders.
ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS
Well if you're a coder, a coding student, or have done any research at all about the coding field, you know we're in for a huge change with the implementation of ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS in 2013. I would like to say that all organizations are in full swing and getting ready for the transition. What I'm hearing as I talk with organizations, though, is that they are just getting started - a full 1-2 years behind the recommended schedule.
In recent weeks I've taken my ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer recertification through AHIMA and kicked off a Task Force through the Colorado Health Information Management Association (CHIMA). As chairperson of the ICD-10 Task Force here in Colorado, I've had the chance to meet with providers and organizations who will be impacted by the ICD-10 code sets. And I am also embarking on a project through AHIMA to get ensure that Colorado Medicaid is ready for the transition.
In addition to that, I'm preparing presentations for the spring conference season and developing ICD-10 tools and training programs for my company. Here's a shameless plug for The Wilshire Group - just in case you're looking for some additional ICD-10 references! My favorite part is the ICD-10 countdown. I've set this as one of my home pages so I can feel the urgency every time I open my browser!
Prepare for Your Challenge
If you really have a passion for coding, then this commentary got you really excited to learn more. I wish I could properly convey how much more difficult coding is than simply looking up a code in a book. And I wish you could get an accurate depiction of what your daily work will look like as a coder. But the truth is, you don't really "get it" until you get into it and although I know so many are frustrated because they can't get the required experience to get hired, I've said it time and again - keep trying to find an angle to get the experience you need to get your foot in the door. And once you're in, I hope you're ready for the challenge because it's a constant learning experience.
